I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 because the main-stream news have actually guaranteed extremely people that are few the information associated with the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought never to have now been arrested into the united kingdom to start with while there is no case, with no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and you also shall know why.

One other thing maybe perhaps perhaps not commonly grasped will there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TEST. All associated with proof, all the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. Truly the only part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. Which means you never ever would get to comprehend just how clearly the full instance is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.

You will find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps down I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:

Why did Anna Ardin perhaps maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?

On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become known within the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking pink cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been about to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who had been searching for Assange:

“He’s maybe not here. He’s planned to own intercourse with all the cashmere woman every evening, yet not caused it to be. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”

Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being happy to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She ended up being also to convey that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been worried about HIV.

If Ardin really thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex on her and also this may have sent HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at threat of her life? And exactly why ended up being Ardin discussing with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?

Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press conference. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.

Why don’t we fit that into an extremely brief survey associated with entire Ardin/Assange relationship.

11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised by way of a branch for the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.

13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange plus they have consensual intercourse, from the day that is first of. Ardin afterwards alleges this converted into attack by https://www.camsloveaholics.com/nudelive-review surreptitious mutilation of this condom.

14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.

‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’

This try to find a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”

15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:

‘Sitting in the open air at 02:00 and scarcely freezing aided by the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing! #fb’

Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their police testimonies, rest once again in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep within the bed that is same.

16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t warn her of prospective intimate attack. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more declines.

20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is concerned about STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s unrecorded – in breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans prepares a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not sign it.

21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.

Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; however a forensic examination discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA about it, as well as its apparently unused.

No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead never to complain of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to sign the declaration alleging rape, that was used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.

It is ordinary this one of a few things occurred:

Either

Ardin was intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.

Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, can be found in general general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and sleep in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated proposes to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.

Or

Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him making use of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.

She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the very least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale as a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen refused to signal.

In the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any fees against JA nevertheless the police desired to control him. ”

At 17.26 she texted that she ended up being “shocked if they arrested JA because we just desired him to have a test”.

The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it had been law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.

Ardin then constructed her very own story of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she had been making love with Assange, she could perhaps not claim sex that is non-consensual. So she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event associated with the torn condom. Nevertheless the torn condom she produced does not have any trace of Assange onto it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never leave a DNA trace.

Summary

We have no trouble in stating that We securely believe Ardin to be a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which can be, within the sense that is literal amazing.

Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever designed to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden are held totally in key. There isn’t any jury, in addition to federal federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he can disappear completely into prison, the trial are going to be key, plus the the next thing you are going to hear is the fact that he is accountable and a rapist.

Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data can be so poor, as merely to cry rape is always to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The important points of this whole story being pathetic is unimportant.

By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line it is incorrect also to check out evidence. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?

Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that how you can test these issues is in court, I would personally state needless to say, you will be appropriate, we have to trust hawaii constantly, fit-ups never happen, so we should definitely condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.